Silicon Valley Bank the collapse
The largest bank to have failed since 2008 and the 2nd largest bank to have failed in US history. Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) was a bank that specialized in serving technology and innovation companies. It closed its doors in March 2023.
Silicon Valley Bank served:
- Technology companies: This includes companies of all sizes, from startups to established giants, across various tech subfields like software, hardware, internet, and telecommunications.
- Life Sciences: Pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, medical device manufacturers, and healthcare organizations were also major clients.
- Venture Capital & Private Equity: SVB provided specialized services to investors financing these types of companies.
- Premium Wine: This niche industry also benefited from SVB's unique understanding of their needs
- Their clients even included AirBnb , Fitbit and Pintrest
in 2020 and 2021, SVB experienced prosperous years, benefiting from the ability to borrow money from the Fed at a very low interest rate of 0.08. This allowed them to provide loans to startups and still generate substantial profits.
Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) faced challenges due to several factors:
Heavy investment in long-term bonds: SVB invested heavily in long-term Treasury bonds, offering low interest rates (around 1.56%). This locked up a significant amount of their money (over $90 billion) for an average of 10 years, making it difficult to access quickly.
Higher interest rates and falling demand: Rising interest rates set by the Federal Reserve caused the demand for loans and mortgage-backed securities to decrease. This led to a drop in the value of SVB's investments, with their mortgage-backed securities losing $15 billion in value (from $91 billion to $76 billion).
Limited liquidity: While these losses weren't realized unless SVB sold the bonds, a lack of available cash became an issue. Most of their funds were tied up in long-term investments, making it difficult to meet the demands of depositors who increasingly wanted to withdraw their money during the start-up winter. They started selling bonds which caused panic in investors and depositors that SVB was not liquid
Startups pulling out funds: Panicked by the news of SVB's situation and concerned about their own deposits, startups and investors like Peter Thiel began withdrawing their money from the bank. This created a domino effect, with more depositors and investors fearing insolvency and pulling out their funds, causing SVB's share price to plummet.
Panic-driven collapse: Ultimately, it wasn't the initial investment losses but the panic and subsequent mass withdrawals that caused SVB's collapse.
Comments
Post a Comment